The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE week that is last EU-wide online gambling legislation would maybe not take place in his life time ‘or the next.’
The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the concept of a pan-European framework that is regulatory online gambling, accepting that each member states mostly oppose synchronizing their Internet video gaming regulations. The move interestingly mirrors comparable problems in america, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.
Talking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC wasn’t working on sector-specific legislation in gambling.
‘The Commission is not proposing it and will maybe not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my lifetime or the next.’
Temmink leads the gambling team product and chairs the EC’s Expert Group on Gambling Services.
This is a cry that is far the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed A eu-wide framework devoted to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraudulence, and maintaining the integrity of activities.
EU Action Plan
Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and technical [online gambling] issues in the EU’ could not be ‘tackled adequately by member states individually.’
‘This is particularly true given the cross-border dimension of on the web gambling,’ he said in 2012, when it was established that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to simplify the regulation associated with sector and encourage cooperation between member states.
The EC frowned on the regulatory actions that had been drawn in France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a rate that is high in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free movement of services between member states.
Barnier’s plan had beenn’t proposing just one licensing that is EU, but alternatively had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its vision for a far more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. User states that refused to play ball would be sanctioned, then in Barnier’s vision.
But Barnier left the post in 2014, and his successor, Günther Oettinger, seems less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to regulation that is leaving individual jurisdictions.
More Fragmented than Ever
As Temmink explained, ‘I can assure you that whenever we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first conference with the Council, we would have 26 away from 28 member states that could be fiercely opposed to the proposal.
‘It could be committing suicide,’ he added.
Since Barnier outlined his plan in 2012, a wave of brand new regulation has spread across European countries, and numerous new licensing regimes have sprung up, from the UK to Portugal. Europe has become even less coordinated on the front that is iGaming as well as the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.
‘Operators need to have a license for the country that is specific which they offer games, without having to be able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make certain a system that is non-discriminatory of licenses.’
Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Is Key
Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as many Nevada voters as possible prior to the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what’s shaping up to be always a make-or-break point within the Democratic campaign. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)
Nevada voters are the focal point for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns appropriate now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees you will need to persuade as many last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February 23rd caucus.
The Silver State had long been thought to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum after Clinton’s narrow victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire. She once held a lead that is nearly 50-point her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with many analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.
Clinton and Sanders each invested the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las vegas, nevada on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in several places around the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.
The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation mainly made up of African-Americans.
‘If we can win here in Nevada, we send a profound message to the complete country, and that message is the fact that individuals of this country will no further accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks.
Clinton responded to Sanders with a relative line as vague as Bernie’s plan of just how he will fund his utopian vision.
‘I am maybe not a single issue candidate,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because whenever we had been going to achieve everything about banks and cash and politics, would that end racism?’
Say what now?
Nevada Key State in Runoff
When Sanders officially announced his decision to operate for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was currently going to work in Nevada. Volunteers had been making hundreds of daily calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.
The Vermont senator didn’t have much of an opportunity, at least according to pundits that are political.
Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an event in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each phase, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.
Nevada has a long history of being a swing state within the general presidential election, and its constituents have actually an almost perfect record of voting for the ultimate winner. Since 1912, Nevada has properly picked the president that is next except for in 1976, whenever Nevada went to Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.
A win in Nevada for Clinton will be anticipated, while a win for Sanders pull down just what would perhaps function as the biggest political upset in modern history.
Neck-in-Neck towards the Finish
Nevada hosts the gambling epicenter of the United States, so possibly it is appropriate that there is little statistical evidence to run using in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.
The reality is that gambling on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to betting on black or red. The absolute most poll that is recent TargetPoint, 1st governmental data on the battle since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.
Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot
Including to your intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent causes that are natural the age of 79. Appointed to your bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the highest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.
A number of names have been tossed around, including current Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval (R). Though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him appear unlikely for an Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage a welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders.
Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties
Michonne Ascuaga, who has resigned through the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a home she previously managed with her household, the Sparks Nugget in north Nevada, is being investigated for lax anti-money laundering controls. (Image: ktvn.com)
Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post on the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of so-called improprieties that are financial the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she managed for 16 years.
The Nugget will be investigated by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations that it did not comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to establish an effective anti-money program that is laundering.
The investigation stumbled on light in a court filing last week, 888 casino 88 giocate gratis as section of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family members contrary to the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment group that bought the home in 2013.
Sandoval Unaware of Investigation
A spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval had been unaware regarding the research whenever he appointed Ascuaga to your Gaming Commission panel last April.
‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ published Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and wish to recognize her family members’ long history as leaders into the gaming industry.
‘I appreciate he added that she has put the credibility and reputation of the Gaming Commission first. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will still be a leader in our community.’
Ascuaga has claimed in a official statement that she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’
‘The Sparks Nugget had been informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department ended up being investigating whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations,’ she added. ‘The matter arose from an audit-type examination carried out by the IRS at the casino this season. This is all disclosed immediately to your buyer.’
Its alleged that the Nugget will be investigated for laxity in its record-keeping and reporting requirements. By legislation, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all transactions over $10,000, and report any activity that is suspicious FinCEN, as a means of guarding against money-laundering.
Ascuaga may be the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of a Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family believes it is still owed $500,000 underneath the purchase and purchase agreement of the Nugget.
Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission and also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the crucial regulatory oversight work it does.’